雅思IELTS寫作Task 1雙圖表的Band 6、7、8版本
簡答
本頁用一張長條圖和一張圓餅圖,把同一道虛構的Task 1題目回答了三次,分別是Band 6、7、8,三份報告有相同的overview(整體概述)和相同的主要特徵,並標示出哪些片語會得分或失分。遇到兩張圖表時,最常拉開分數差距的,是overview有沒有把兩張圖合成一個畫面,以及每個數字有沒有保留自己的單位。
在App裡,Task 1報告會得到4個評分項目各自的分數區間,Data Accuracy卡片則把讀錯圖表和語言錯誤分開。
iOS與Android
App的介面是英文;本網站用中文為你說明。
本頁內容
本頁用一道虛構的Task 1題目,配上兩張圖表,分別寫出Band 6、Band 7和Band 8的報告。三份報告有相同的overview和相同的主要特徵,所以你看到的差別屬於分數等級,而不是數據。如何從圖表中選出特徵,請見圖表、圖形與表格的描述方式;一道題目配兩張圖表,屬於IELTS.org所說的「one or more」,格式頁面並沒有列出會出現哪些組合。
這3份報告是為本網站寫的。它們不是來自真實的試卷,也沒有經過IELTS評分,它們是用來比較的示範,不是要背的答案。IELTS.org會對背誦和抄襲的內容扣分,你考試時的圖表也會不同,所以本頁的用途是讓你看清楚每個分數等級是什麼樣子。
重點整理
- 3份報告的overview相同,用的主要特徵也相同。不同的是overview有沒有把兩張圖表連起來、數字怎麼分組,以及句子寫得有多準確。
- Band 6的報告有overview,也報告了許多正確的數字,但它把兩張圖表一張接一張地描述,給出圖表沒有給的理由,還把小時和百分比混在一起。
- Band 7的報告透過private study把兩張圖表連起來,並把兩個比例合成一個數字。
- Band 8的報告把圓餅圖的百分比套用到長條圖的小時數上,所以兩張圖表讀起來像同一組數據。
題目
這道題目是為練習而虛構的,不是歷屆試題。數字是為練習編出來的整數。
The bar chart shows the average number of hours per week that first-year and final-year students at a university spent on four activities in 2025. The pie chart shows where the final-year students did their private study. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
長條圖:每週平均小時數,2025年。
| Activity | First-year students | Final-year students |
|---|---|---|
| Lectures and classes | 14 | 10 |
| Private study | 12 | 18 |
| Social activities | 10 | 8 |
| Sport | 4 | 4 |
圓餅圖:大四學生在哪裡private study,2025年(占他們private study時數的比例)。
| Place | Share |
|---|---|
| Library | 45% |
| Home | 35% |
| Other study spaces on campus | 15% |
| Elsewhere | 5% |
每一組的四項活動加起來是40小時,四個比例加起來是100%。3份報告都用這個規劃:
- 引言:用新的說法寫出每張圖表呈現了什麼。
- Overview:從大一到大四,時間從上課移到private study,它是唯一增加的活動,而且大四學生主要在圖書館或家裡讀書。
- 細節一:長條圖,依減少的、增加的和維持不變的來分組。
- 細節二:圓餅圖,把圖書館和家裡合在一起,視為主要的地點。
同一份報告的Band 6、7、8版本
將游標移到標示的片語上或點一下,就能看到評分者會注意的地方。圖例會標明每種顏色對應的評分項目,橘色標示的是會被扣分的失誤。
Band 6
The bar chart shows how many hours first-year and final-year students spent on four activities in a week, and the pie chart shows where the final-year students did their private study. Overall, the first-year students and the final-year students did different things, and the final-year students studied in different places有overview,但很籠統:沒有變化的方向,也沒有把兩張圖連起來.
In the bar chart, the first-year students spent 14 hours in lectures and classes, but the final-year students spend時態:數據是2025年的,所以應為「spent」 10 hours. Private study was 12 hours for the first-year students and 18 hours for the final-year students, and this was because the final-year students have exams圖表沒有給出的理由;報告描述數據,不解釋數據. Social activities was一致問題:應為「Social activities were」 10 hours for the first-year students and 8 hours for the final-year students, and sport was 4 hours for both groups of students.
In the pie chart, the library was the biggest share with 45 per cent開始另一段獨立的描述;沒有任何東西把它和上面的18小時private study連起來. Home was the second biggest share with 35 per cent. The final-year students spent 45 hours in the library單位混淆:45是讀書時間的百分比,不是小時數. Other study places on campus were 15 per cent and the last was 5 per cent含糊:應該說出類別名稱,例如「elsewhere」.
Band 7
The bar chart compares the average weekly hours that first-year and final-year students spent on four activities, while the pie chart shows where final-year students did their private study.
Overall, final-year students spent less time in classes and more on private study than first-year students, and most of that study took place in the library or at homeoverview涵蓋兩張圖,並透過private study把它們連起來.
First-year students spent most time in lectures and classes, at 14 hours, compared with 12 hours of private study. For final-year students the pattern reversed: private study rose to 18 hours, while classes fell to 10兩個對比的數字放在同一個句子裡互相對照. Social activities declined slightly動詞和副詞符合只減少2小時的下降 from 10 to 8 hours, and sport stayed at four hours in both groups, which is the less time of all the activities比較的失誤:應為「the least time」.
The pie chart shows that the library accounted for the largest share說一個類別是整體的一部分的標準說法 of private study, at 45 per cent, followed by home, at 35 per cent. Together these two places made up 80 per cent of the total重點特徵:把兩個數字合成一個,支持overview, while other study spaces on campus and other places accounted for just 15 and 5 per cent respectively.
Band 8
The bar chart compares how first-year and final-year students divided a 40-hour week between four activities在引言裡就交代了數據的規模,用的動詞也很貼切, and the pie chart breaks down where final-year students did their private study.
Overall, the move from the first year to the final year shifted time from classes to private study, the only activity to rise, and most of that study took place in the library or at homeoverview給出變化的方向,點出唯一上升的活動,並連到圓餅圖.
Lectures and classes took up the most time in the first year, at 14 hours, but fell to 10 in the final year, while private study rose from 12 hours to 18 and became the largest activity用四個字替這項活動排名,所以不需要另外的比較. The extra six hours of study came from classes and social time, which lost four and two hours respectively把三個數字合成對這個轉變的一個解釋,並和前一句連起來, while sport stayed at four hours in both years.
Of that private study, the library accounted for the largest share, 45 per cent, or roughly eight hours把圓餅圖的百分比套用到長條圖的18小時,把兩張圖連起來, with home next at 35 per cent. The other campus study spaces and other places made up just 15 and 5 per cent, so four-fifths of the study was done in the first two places主要子句後接結果子句,分數也和80%吻合.
讓分數不同的關鍵
以下的說明依循公開的評分標準,並採用本網站的改寫。每段引文都來自該句所指分數等級的報告。
Task Achievement
Band 6的報告有overview,也有許多準確的數字,但總結很籠統:「the first-year students and the final-year students did different things」沒有給出方向。有兩個細節也偏離了數據:「this was because the final-year students have exams」是兩張圖表都沒有給出的理由,「The final-year students spent 45 hours in the library」則把百分比當成了小時。
Band 7判斷出方向,並把兩張圖表連起來。「final-year students spent less time in classes and more on private study」點出了什麼變動,「Together these two places made up 80 per cent of the total」則加了一個圓餅圖暗示、卻沒有印出來的數字。
Band 8再進一步,讓一張圖表去用另一張圖表。「or roughly eight hours」把45%套用到18小時的private study上,於是兩張圖表成了同一組數據。Band 7的Task Achievement(任務達成度)描述收錄了這段說明所改寫的原文。
Coherence and Cohesion
Band 6的報告分成段落,但它把兩張圖表當成兩份報告。「In the pie chart, the library was the biggest share with 45 per cent」開始了一段新的描述,沒有任何東西說明它和上面的18小時有什麼關聯。
Band 7把數字互相對照。「private study rose to 18 hours, while classes fell to 10」是一個句子裡的對比,而圓餅圖的那一段以「The pie chart shows that the library」開頭,所以讀者知道報告已經往下走了。
Band 8讓數字彼此說明。「The extra six hours of study came from classes and social time, which lost four and two hours respectively」把三個數字連到一個結果,後面的段落則從「that private study」接著說下去。Band 6的Coherence and Cohesion(連貫與銜接)描述描述了這種機械的模式。
Lexical Resource
Band 6的詞彙足以完成這兩張圖表,但嘗試使用精確的說法並不都正確:「the last was 5 per cent」沒有點出類別名稱,而「was」做的,是本來該由rise和fall這類表示變化的動詞來做的工作。
Band 7靈活而且大多精確。「accounted for the largest share」是描述整體中一部分的標準說法,「declined slightly」則符合只減少2小時的下降。「which is the less time of all the activities」還留下一個失誤,這裡需要用最高級。
Band 8選字是為了準確。「became the largest activity」用四個字替private study排名,「divided a 40-hour week between four activities」則在引言裡交代了數據的規模。Band 8的Lexical Resource(詞彙資源)描述描述了這種掌控力。
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Band 6的報告混合使用簡單句和複雜句,錯誤很小:「the final-year students spend 10 hours」對2025年的數據用了錯的時態,「Social activities was 10 hours」則在一致性上出了錯。
Band 7有幾種複雜句,而且很多寫得乾淨。「Social activities declined slightly from 10 to 8 hours, and sport stayed at four hours in both groups」在一個準確的句子裡連起兩個特徵,還留下一個比較的失誤。
Band 8的範圍更廣,幾乎每個句子都沒有錯。「The other campus study spaces and other places made up just 15 and 5 per cent, so four-fifths of the study was done in the first two places」連接了一個主要子句和一個結果子句,分數也和前兩個比例加起來的80%相符。請對照Band 7的Grammatical Range and Accuracy(文法多樣性與準確度)描述。
這種題型的陷阱
這些陷阱來自圖表、圖形與表格指南,而且每一個都能在Band 6的報告中看到。
- 把每個數字都列出來。Band 6的長條圖段落把全部8個數字逐一報告,沒有任何句子說哪些重要。請依減少的、增加的和維持不變的來把數字分組。
- 給理由。圖表說的是多少小時、哪些地點,沒有說為什麼。「this was because the final-year students have exams」是猜測,評分者會把它當成圖表沒有支持的資訊。
- 混用單位。長條圖的單位是小時,圓餅圖是百分比。「spent 45 hours in the library」把一張圖表的單位放到另一張圖表的數字上。邊寫邊在每個數字旁邊寫上單位。
- 寫成兩份報告。Band 6的報告寫完長條圖才開始寫圓餅圖,從來沒有把它們連起來。請在動筆前先找出連結(這裡是private study),並把它寫進overview。
如何使用這些範文
先用20分鐘,針對同一道題目寫出你自己的報告。接著把這3份報告和你的報告逐段對照,問自己每個段落在4個評分項目上,各像哪個分數等級。請把你報告裡的每個數字和每個單位,都對照表格檢查。
然後用同樣的標記代碼,替你自己的報告做記號:你的overview在哪裡把兩張圖表連起來、哪個連接撐起了邏輯、哪個字用得剛好,以及評分者會圈出哪些失誤。不要背這些頁面上的任何句子:IELTS.org會對背誦的內容扣分,而且考試的圖表不會和這幾張相同。想要更多同類練習,請使用Writing Task 1練習。
App的評分方式
IELTS Mentor AI會為Task 1報告的4個評分項目各給一個分數區間,從嚴格的評讀到寬鬆的評讀,接著說明每個評分項目哪裡做得好、怎麼改進。Data Accuracy(數據準確度)卡片會把讀錯圖像和語言錯誤分開,編輯器的計時是20分鐘,並即時顯示字數,對照150字的最低要求。
在備考中的定位
本頁屬於圖表、圖形與表格指南,該指南說明做法;也屬於Writing考試形式指南,該指南涵蓋整個考試。一連串階段的同類練習,請見Band 6、7、8的流程圖範文,地點變化的同類練習,請見地圖範文。4個評分項目如何組成Writing分數,請見IELTS Writing分數如何計算;想知道每個分數等級的要求,請見評分標準工具。
常見問題
IELTS Writing Task 1會同時給我兩張圖表嗎?
IELTS.org的Academic Writing格式頁面說,Task 1可能是一張或多張圖形、圖表或表格,或是一張示意圖。它沒有公布各種組合出現的頻率,所以單一圖像和成對的圖像都要練習。
這些雙圖表範文來自真實的IELTS試卷嗎?
不是。它們是為本網站針對虛構的數據而寫的,沒有經過IELTS評分。每一份所代表的分數等級,是本網站對公開評分標準的解讀,並不是任何考官給的分數。
我該寫一個overview還是兩個?
IELTS.org沒有規定。Task Achievement的評分標準要找的是對整體畫面的清楚總結,所以一個涵蓋兩張圖、並顯示它們如何相連的overview,通常比兩個各自獨立的更清楚。
我可以背下Band 8的報告,然後在考試中使用嗎?
不可以。IELTS.org會對背誦和抄襲的內容扣分,而且你考試時的圖表會不同,背下來的報告無法描述它們。請用這3份報告來和自己的寫作比較。