Guide · Problem
· 11 min read

An IELTS advantages and disadvantages essay at Band 6, 7 and 8

Quick answer

This page answers one invented "do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages" question three times, with the same verdict and the same two ideas, at Band 6, 7 and 8, and marks the phrases that earn or lose marks. In this shape, what most often separates the bands is whether the verdict is argued: at Band 6 the weighing is announced and repeated, and at higher bands the essay shows why one side counts for more.

The app marks a Task 2 essay on four criteria and gives an Examiner's Summary, with what worked and how to improve for each criterion.

iOS and Android

Paid app: what it costs · billing and refunds · support

On this page

This page takes one invented question and answers it three times. The verdict is the same, the advantage and the disadvantage are the same, and only the writing changes, so you can see what moves an essay from Band 6 to 7 to 8. The question belongs to the shape described in how to answer advantages and disadvantages questions, a label from practice material and not a category IELTS uses.

The three essays were written for this site. They are not from a real paper, they were not marked by IELTS, and they are not answers to memorise: IELTS.org penalises memorised and plagiarised content, and the question in your exam will be different. Use them to compare, then write your own.

Key takeaways

  • The same verdict, argued three ways, shows that the band comes from development and control, not from a different opinion.
  • At Band 6 the verdict is announced and the conclusion repeats it; at Band 7 it is argued; at Band 8 the weighing is part of the paragraph.
  • A disadvantage that is named but not explained is the usual Band 6 gap.
  • Band 8 is precision, not rare vocabulary.
  • Everything said here about the bands comes from the public band descriptors, as this site paraphrases them.

The prompt

Many people now learn foreign languages through online lessons instead of attending classes in a school or language centre. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

This prompt is invented for practice. All three essays share one plan:

  • Verdict: the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
  • Advantage: flexibility. Lessons fit around work and family, and a lesson can be replayed.
  • Disadvantage: less unplanned speaking practice than in a classroom.
  • Weighing: speaking practice can be arranged separately, but a fixed timetable shuts many people out altogether.
  • Four paragraphs: introduction, advantage, disadvantage, conclusion.

The same essay at Band 6, 7 and 8

Hover over or tap a marked phrase to see what a marker would note. The legend names the criterion each colour stands for.

Band 6

Nowadays many people learn languages through online lessons, and fewer people go to classes in a school. Some people say that classes with a teacher are always better, but I do not agree. Many of my friends study in this way. In my opinion the advantages of this development are bigger than the disadvantages, and I will explain why in this essay.

The main advantage of online lessons is that they are flexible. FirstlyA label that opens the point but links nothing to the introduction, people who work or look after children is not ableSubject-verb agreement: should be “are not able” to attend a class at a fixed time, but with online lessons they can study in the evening or at the weekend. For example, a mother can study after her children are asleep. This is the reason why I think online lessons are more convenient. Also, it is easy to start because you only need a computer. Also, they can watch the lesson again if they did not understand something, and this is very goodVague, basic phrase; a more exact word such as “valuable” is needed for students who learn slowly.

However, there is also a disadvantage. The students do not get enough chance to speak with other peopleDisadvantage is named but not explained, and no example is given. In a real class they speak with the teacher and the other students all the time, and this make them more confidentSubject-verb agreement: should be “this makes them”. Online they often only listen to a video, so they can feel aloneWrong word choice: “lonely” is the usual word here. Speaking is a very important part of a language, so this is a problem for some people.

To conclude, online lessons are flexible but students speak less, and the advantages are biggerThe conclusion repeats the introduction in other words and does not weigh the two sides. So I think the advantages is more thanShould be “advantages are greater than” or “advantages outweigh” the disadvantages, and online lessons are a good choice for many people today. In the future more people will use them.

Band 7

Learning a language online has become common, and many people no longer attend classes in a school or language centre. Online study is available to almost anyone with a connection. Although this change has drawbacks, I believe that its advantages outweigh them.

The main advantage is flexibilityThe topic sentence names the one subject of the paragraph. Adults who work long hours or look after children often cannot commit to a class at a fixed time, whereas online lessons can be fitted into an evening or a weekend. For a parent returning from work, an hour on a fixed evening may simply be impossible, whereas a lesson that waits until the children are asleep remains available. Learners can also replay a recording when an explanation is unclear, something that a live class does not allowShort relative clause attached to the previous idea with a comma. As a result, people who might otherwise have given up can keep studying regularly.

The main disadvantage is that learners get less spontaneous speaking practice. In a classroom, students must respond immediately to a teacher or a classmate, and this pressure gradually builds confidenceNatural collocation. Speaking is a skill that grows through repeated, unplanned exchanges, so its absence matters. A learner who only watches recorded lessons may understand grammar well yet hesitate when speakVerb form: should be “speaking” to a real person. However, this problem is not impossible to solve, since many online courses now offer live conversation sessionsThe disadvantage is explained and then weighed, which supports the verdict.

In conclusion, online lessons reduce the amount of natural conversation, but flexibility decides whether many people can learn at allGives the reason behind the verdict instead of repeating it. For this reason I believe the advantages are greater thanCorrect but plain comparison; a more varied verb would lift the range the disadvantages. Learners who combine recorded lessons with regular conversation practice can gain both benefits.

Band 8

Online lessons are replacing the classroom for a growing number of language learners. The question is how much each side weighs. This development does carry a real drawback, but I believe the advantages outweigh it, chiefly because flexibility determines whether many adults study at allVerdict stated with its reason in the first paragraph.

The decisive advantage is flexibility. A parent or shift worker cannot commit to a class that meets at a fixed hour, but can complete an online lesson at midnight if that is the only time available. The effect is practical rather than theoretical: a lesson that fits the day is far more likely to be attended. Recorded material adds a second benefit: a learner can replay an unclear explanation until it makes sense, something a classroom lesson, once finished, never permitsColon, apposition and inserted phrase used with full control. Together these features turn language learning from a privilege of those with regular timetablesPrecise noun phrase that carries the contrast into something most adults can sustain.

The real disadvantage is the scarcity of unplanned speaking. In a classroom, a learner must answer a question immediately, and that mild pressure is what turns knowledge into fluencyExact wording for the effect; a student who only watches lessons may understand the grammar perfectly yet hesitate when addressed by a real person. The concern is therefore legitimate, and it would be wrong to dismiss it. This weakness, however, is neither universal nor permanentSentence turns the paragraph from the drawback to the weighing without a label. Many courses now include live conversation sessions, and learners can arrange practice with a partner independently.

On balance, the loss of spontaneous practice is real but remediable, whereas rigid timetables simply exclude peopleConclusion weighs the sides and gives the reason the verdict holds. The advantages therefore carry more weight, because a learner who cannot attend a class cannot practise anything.

What moved the band

The notes below follow the public band descriptors, as this site paraphrases them. Each quotation comes from the essay named beside it.

Task Response

The Band 6 essay gives a verdict and covers both sides, but the disadvantage is only named: “The students do not get enough chance to speak with other people” is followed by a generalisation, not an example, and the conclusion, “To conclude, online lessons are flexible but students speak less, and the advantages are bigger”, repeats the introduction. At Band 7 the drawback is explained and then weighed against the verdict: “However, this problem is not impossible to solve, since many online courses now offer live conversation sessions”. At Band 8 the weighing is the reason the verdict holds: “On balance, the loss of spontaneous practice is real but remediable, whereas rigid timetables simply exclude people”. See the Task Response cell for Band 7.

Coherence and Cohesion

Band 6 opens a point with “Firstly” in a paragraph that has only one point, so the label links nothing. Band 7 gives each paragraph one subject, announced at once: “The main advantage is flexibility”. It also ends on the reason behind the verdict: “flexibility decides whether many people can learn at all”. At Band 8 the turn from the drawback to the weighing needs no connector: “This weakness, however, is neither universal nor permanent”. The Coherence and Cohesion cell for Band 6 describes the mechanical pattern.

Lexical Resource

Band 6 is understandable but plain, with “very good” doing the work of a precise word and “alone” where the usual word is lonely. Band 7 uses natural pairings such as “builds confidence”. Band 8 chooses wording for exactness, not rarity: “a privilege of those with regular timetables” carries the contrast in seven common words, and “what turns knowledge into fluency” names the effect of classroom pressure. See the Lexical Resource cell for Band 8.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

Band 6 mixes simple and complex sentences, and the errors do not stop the meaning: “this make them more confident” and “advantages is more than”. Band 7 handles a longer sentence with a comma and a relative clause, “a live class does not allow”, though a slip remains in “yet hesitate when speak”. At Band 8 one sentence holds a colon, an apposition and an inserted phrase without strain: “a learner can replay an unclear explanation until it makes sense, something a classroom lesson, once finished, never permits”. The Grammatical Range and Accuracy cell for Band 7 gives the pattern in more detail.

Traps this shape sets

  • A disadvantage named, not explained. The Band 6 essay says students “do not get enough chance to speak” and moves on, without saying what is lost.
  • A verdict that is only repeated. The Band 6 conclusion says the advantages are bigger, as the introduction did, and gives no reason.
  • Labels in place of links. “Firstly” opens a paragraph whose only point needs no label.
  • One side thin. The Band 6 essay gives the advantage more room than the disadvantage and never weighs one against the other.

How to use these essays

Write your own answer to the same prompt first, under 40 minutes, with the same limit you would have in the exam. Then compare, paragraph by paragraph: where does yours explain a point, and where does it only name one? Mark your own script with the four codes, Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource and Grammatical Range and Accuracy, and note where the marks would fall. The Task 2 essay structure post covers the plan. Do not memorise any essay here: the prompt in the exam will be different, and IELTS.org penalises memorised content. To get a second reading of your own script, the essay checker is the place.

How the app marks it

IELTS Mentor AI marks a Task 2 essay with an overall Writing band, a band for each of the four criteria and an Examiner’s Summary, with what worked and how to improve for each criterion. The editor is timed at 40:00 and shows a live word count against the 250 minimum, and you can photograph a handwritten answer instead of typing it.

Where this fits

This page belongs to how to answer advantages and disadvantages questions. The whole test is covered in the Writing test format guide. The same treatment is given to other question wordings: agree or disagree, discuss both views, problem and solution and two-part questions. For what moves a script into Band 7, read how to get Band 7 in IELTS Writing.

Frequently asked questions

Can I use these essays as my answer in the exam?

No. They were written for this site, are not from a real paper and were not marked by IELTS. IELTS.org penalises memorised and plagiarised content, and the prompt in the exam will be different. Use them to compare your own writing with, not to copy.

Were these essays marked by IELTS?

No. The three essays were written for this site to show what each band tends to look like, using the public band descriptors as this site paraphrases them. The band attached to each is a teaching label, not a score that anyone reported.

Why do all three essays reach the same verdict?

So that the writing is the only thing that changes. The verdict, the advantage and the disadvantage are identical, which means any difference between the essays comes from how the ideas are explained, linked and worded.

Does an advantages and disadvantages essay need a verdict?

It depends on the final instruction. A question that asks whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages asks for a judgement. A question that asks you to discuss both sides asks for coverage. Read the last line of the question before you plan.

Must I give the same space to both sides?

IELTS publishes no rule. The public band descriptors treat one part of a question getting far more room than another as a weakness at Band 6. A fair share for each side, with the verdict leaning where your argument leans, is a safe working choice.

Practise this with instant AI feedback

Record your answer in the app and get your grammar, vocabulary, fluency and pronunciation analysed in seconds.

Paid app: what it costs · billing and refunds · support

Related

Related across the site

All guides →